PDA

View Full Version : K-Box Courts Case??


DAB
04-14-2010, 08:48 PM
Hi every body! I will put this here ,because I do not if it is true..
Hope someone can give us the good info..
Will be appreciated..

C/P:

K-Box Courts Case

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$500,000 for D*sh Network in Nguyen/kBox IKS Server Farm Case



Defendant violated federal laws by offering to the public, providing, or otherwise engaging in the traffic of devices, components, and/or technologies that are primarily designed to circumvent and/or defeat Plaintiffs’ Security System and ultimately facilitate the unauthorized reception of Plaintiffs’ encrypted satellite signals and copyrighted D*SH Network Programming.

Such devices, components and/or technologies include D*SH Network receivers and access cards linked to accounts which were opened to support a kBox Internet Key Sharing (“IKS”) server farm and related IKS website.

Defendant acknowledges and admits that each of the foregoing was primarily used to facilitate piracy of satellite television programming.



This Permanent Injunction takes effect immediately.

Should Defendant breach any part of this Final Judgment or Permanent Injunction, he shall be subject to damages in the amount of $110,000 for each such breach or violation, which is the maximum statutory damage permitted per violation under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)-(ii). For purposes of assessing damages under this section, each “device, product, file, technology or part or component thereof” that is distributed by Defendant or others acting in active participation or concert with Defendant in violation of this Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction shall constitute a separate and discrete violation. In the case of any software, firmware or other file distributed or posted by Defendant or others acting in active participation or concert with Defendant, each time that software, firmware or other file is downloaded by an end-user shall constitute a separate and discrete “violation” for purposes of quantifying damages set forth in this section.

The Court further ORDERS judgment in favor of Plaintiffs D*SH Network L.L.C., E*hoStar Technologies L.L.C. and N*graStar LLC on each of Plaintiffs’ claims under 17 U.S.C. § 1201, 47 U.S.C. § 605, and 18 U.S.C. § 2511, and for breach of contract (Counts 1-5 in Plaintiffs’ Complaint) in the aggregate amount of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) as to Defendant.
Filed 02/11/2010 & Entered 02/12/2010
(Refer to the attachments)

Plaintiffs: D*sh Network L.L.C., E*hostar Technologies L.L.C. and N*grastar LLC

Defendants: Thuan Ngoc Nguyen and DOES 1-10

Case Number: 1:2009cv03503
Filed: December 14, 2009

Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Office: Atlanta Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Cooper

Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Cable/Satellite TV
Cause: 47:551 Cable Communications Act
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff


Case History

:confused:

Saludos...

tomnic
04-15-2010, 12:19 AM
Very true. Docs are in the legal section.

Gunsmoke2 - GS2
04-15-2010, 01:46 AM
I do not know if that is K Box though. ?




GS2

DAB
04-15-2010, 07:01 AM
Can you pass this? to the right section.
If it is true..

Thank you.

DAB
04-15-2010, 07:32 AM
Very true. Docs are in the legal section.

Can you direct me to the link ..Please.:o
Thank you..

DAB
04-15-2010, 08:05 AM
I got it ..

Homesl|ce
04-21-2010, 07:16 AM
I thought this was linked to Nfusion...Kbox was back after this filing date, were they not? (Dec 14 ...)

tomnic
04-21-2010, 08:30 PM
The docs for the agreed judgment in the Nguyen case are in the legal docs section under:

Judgments In The IKS Server Lawsuits

For some reason can't link to the page (:

Gunsmoke2 - GS2
04-21-2010, 11:43 PM
The docs for the agreed judgment in the Nguyen case are in the legal docs section under:

Judgments In The IKS Server Lawsuits

For some reason can't link to the page (:



http://www.newcardnews.net/forums/showthread.php?t=7144



I forgot that was k box




GS2

Gunsmoke2 - GS2
04-22-2010, 12:42 AM
Actually I just copied and pasted the file that was posted on another site and did not change the name of it.


I just looked at the case and read the complaint and there is no mention of K box. Its a lawsuit against someone who ran a server. Not sure why someone wrote K box but they are not even listed as defendents. This case is not K box so unless there is another case I have not seen court evidence that they were sued. I should have look at that before.



Defendant
Thuan Ngoc Nguyen
an individual



GS2

tomnic
04-22-2010, 07:34 PM
The server supported the kbox brand but yes, you are correct, kbox is not being claimed against in this particular doc.

Such devices, components and/or technologies include DISH Network receivers and access cards linked to accounts which were opened to support a kBox Internet Key Sharing (“IKS”) server farm and related IKS website.