Echo V Infinity Systems Court Docs

[Gunsmoke2 - GS2]

Echo filed a complaint against Infinity systems and a few other defendants. The case was sealed as the did so under ex parte so the defendants would not know about the Civil impoundment and temporary restraining order. I have attached various docs.


Infinity systems had filed a lawsuit against Nfusion. That case is posted here:



http://www.newcardnews.net/forums/showthread.php?t=7043




GS2

[Gunsmoke2 - GS2]

A fifth extension has been granted in this case. These motions for extension have been filled by the Plaintifs seeking more time for the Defendant to reply. Why. Because it looks like they are moving toward a settlement and the Defendant has filled bankruptcy. That case was provided in the doc I have attached.


I looked up that case. Because there is so much personal information posted about his assets and his wife I am not posting that doc. However I am posting one relevent part where it appears the Defendant has agreed to a $50,000 settlement with the Plaintiff. This appears to be done in conjunction with the Plaintif so I would say it is just about settled.


SCHEDULE F - CREDITORS HOLDING UNSECURED NONPRIORITY CLAIMS

x9CV428 2009

Agreed-to Settlement

Debtors do not contest non-dischargeability,

per 11 U.S.C. § 523 (13).

Dish Network, L.L.C.

c/o John M. McLaughlin

77 Pleasant St.

P.O. Box 210

Northampton, MA 01061

C

50,000.00




GS2

[notrust]

Thank GS2 ,good to see ur on da ball .

[oolloo]

where did these twits get 50 k let alone 600k? next month I will sue the escort agency cause they told me whores are legal.

Thanks for showing us that in fta retards have big money and no brains. or infinity amounts of stupidity lol

[Gunsmoke2 - GS2]

This case is finished. Here is the final judgment doc that I found posted at another site. Can't say the end result is much of a surprise.




GS2

[Gunsmoke2 - GS2]

Here is an update file on the case. Looks like bankruptcy did not protect the defendent from the judgment owing.



Any money due the Plaintiffs from Jerry Pahl pursuant to the Stipulated Judgment is nondischargeable
in any bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to the provisions of Title 11 USC
§523(a) in that;
1. The Plaintiffs allege that Jerry Pahl’s actions amounted to the willful and malicious
damage as to the Plaintiffs’ property; and
2. While Jerry Pahl does not explicitly admit to the Plaintiffs’ allegations, he does admit
there may be sufficient evidence against him from which a trier of fact could find, by
the preponderance of the evidence, that his actions amounted to the willful and
malicious damage as to the Plaintiffs’ property;




GS2